SUMMARY
Four genotypes of
Hevea
brasiliensis namely GT-1, PR-107, PRIM-600 and non graft clones were studied for latex
yield during the year 1988 to 1993. The non graft clone showed the most promising yield
performance (95 ml/tree/tapping) followed by GT-1 (62 ml/tree/trapping). The four
genotypes varied remarkably for the sensitivity to climatic factors. In GT-1 the latex
yield was positively correlated with maximum temperature and negatively correlated with
minimum temperature and humidity. In non graft clone high temperature favour maximum yield
and minimum temperature affected latex yield. The dependence of latex yield on climatic
factors prevailing during year satisfactorily evaluated in non graft clone and GT-1. Hence
these two types are considered suitable for Konkan region.
INTRODUCTION
Hevea brasiliensis
is the principle source of natural rubber. Latex secretion occurs from laticiferous
vessels situlated in the zone of secondary phloem and its flow towards cut end is known to
be governed by several physiological factors (Sethuraj, 1990). Turgor pressure is regarded
as a main driving force behind latex flow (Jacob et al.1990) which is sensitive
environmental factors, especially the soil moisture status. Ambient temperature and
relative humidity are the important climatic factors involved in maintaining the gradiant
for soil-plant-atmosphere continuum of water are therefore expected to affect the turgor
pressure and ultimately the latex yield.
The current
investigation is aimed at assessing the latex yield performance of four genotypes of para
rubber with reference to variation in temperature and humidity in Konkan region of
Maharashtra.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three rubber varieties
namely GT-1, PRIM-600 and PR-107 raised from the grafts alongwith a non graft clone raised
from seeds planted during the year 1978 constituted the experimental material. The
plantation was done at spacing of 16X16 over area of 0.60 hectre at Research
Farm of Botany Department, Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli.
The cultural practices
as per recommendation made by Rubber Board, Kottayam were followed. The plantation block
was not irrigated during the post mansoon season. The tapping of latex commenced from the
year 1988. The latex yield per tapping was recorded for individual trees. The data on
latex yield in relation to climatic factors namely maximum temperature, minimum
temperature, relative humidity, sunshine hours and rainfall were analysed statistically
according to the method given by Gomez and Gomez (1985).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The average latex
yield/tapping of the individual trees of 3 genotypes of rubber and a non graft clone from
the year of commencement of tapping (1988-89) for five years (1992-1993) is given in Table-1. It is revealed that in the average latex yield of
four genotype during initial sharply (64.39 ml) and remained steady during fourth year. In
fifth year (1992-93) it reached as high as 83.15 ml/tree/tapping. Thus the latex yield
increased gradually from commencement of tapping. Among the four genotypes non graft
clones raised from seeds showed highest average latex yield tree/taping 95.95ml Over five
years. The variety GT-1 showed second ranking position (61.97ml) followed by PRIM-600
(53.79ml), with lowest performance of PR-107.
Table 1
Average latex yield
(ml/tree/tapping) of four genotypes of rubber during initial five years of tapping
Genotype |
1988-89 |
1989-90 |
1990-91 |
1991-92 |
1992-93 |
Mean |
GT-1 |
50.06 |
51.40 |
62.42 |
64.52 |
81.46 |
61.97 |
PR-107 |
31.90 |
25.94 |
36.31 |
41.23 |
68.95 |
40.87 |
PRIM-600 |
44.68 |
44.86 |
52.37 |
53.22 |
73.86 |
53.79 |
Non
graf
clone |
72.96 |
73.91 |
106.47 |
122.08 |
104.31 |
95.95 |
mean |
49.9 |
49.03 |
64.39 |
70.26 |
83.15 |
|
The
latex yield per tapping of the four genotypes in each of the fortnight from June to April
end of 1992-93 are given in Table-2. It is noticed
that during June to August the latex yields were very low. During September a sharp rise
was noticed giving more than 100 ml latex/tapping in all the four genotypes. During
October and November the latex yield dropped down noticeably. December and January tapping
exhibited substantially high latex yield. From February onwards the latex yield declined
gradually.
Table 2
Latex yield of hevea in
relation to climatic factors in Konkan region
Mth |
Fort -
night |
Latex yield (m) |
Environmental factors |
|
|
GT-1 |
PR 107 |
PRIM
600 |
Non
graft
trees |
Max
temp.
(0C) |
Min
temp
(0C) |
Av.
Hum-
idity
(%) |
Av.
Sun
shine
(hrs) |
Rain
fall
(mm) |
June |
1 |
48.20 |
20.60 |
43.00 |
28.50 |
33.0 |
25.3 |
70 |
8.2 |
- |
|
2 |
49.03 |
30.70 |
67.00 |
30.58 |
28.3 |
23.6 |
91 |
7.3 |
- |
July |
3 |
49.05 |
51.89 |
77.50 |
30.84 |
28.4 |
23.8 |
89 |
5.1 |
821.5 |
|
4 |
19.21 |
57.57 |
72.50 |
32.90 |
28.2 |
24.2 |
88 |
3.2 |
397.5 |
Aug |
5 |
50.03 |
57.97 |
44.00 |
69.28 |
27.3 |
23.4 |
91 |
2.2 |
752.6 |
|
6 |
53.03 |
58.41 |
44.28 |
79.18 |
27.7 |
23.5 |
91 |
3.4 |
332.8 |
Sept |
7 |
90.50 |
109.00 |
116.68 |
106.55 |
28.2 |
22.4 |
79 |
4.8 |
205.4 |
|
8 |
105.50 |
121.00 |
120.48 |
108.45 |
30.8 |
22.3 |
72 |
7.6 |
12.8 |
Oct |
9 |
81.52 |
90.59 |
70.68 |
85.60 |
30.2 |
22.1 |
73 |
6.7 |
76.1 |
|
10 |
69.50 |
82.59 |
66.72 |
86.00 |
32.5 |
18.5 |
80 |
8.7 |
- |
Nov |
11 |
60.91 |
72.46 |
70.00 |
86.00 |
33.4 |
17.1 |
72 |
8.6 |
- |
|
12 |
70.11 |
83.26 |
76.10 |
86.10 |
23.1 |
17.2 |
72 |
8.4 |
- |
Dec |
13 |
117.74 |
88.72 |
110.70 |
167.60 |
32.4 |
13.3 |
88 |
9.0 |
- |
|
14 |
121.72 |
97.72 |
121.10 |
131.30 |
32.3 |
12.1 |
67 |
9.0 |
- |
Jan |
15 |
129.96 |
83.33 |
98.49 |
130.80 |
31.7 |
11.5 |
67 |
9.2 |
- |
|
16 |
114.16 |
72.33 |
80.37 |
122.00 |
33.9 |
12.2 |
65 |
9.5 |
- |
Feb |
17 |
108.45 |
72.02 |
58.36 |
118.20 |
32.8 |
12.9 |
67 |
9.5 |
- |
|
18 |
86.44 |
70.78 |
56.36 |
100.22 |
31.0 |
12.0 |
69 |
10.1 |
|
March |
19 |
86.43 |
59.86 |
56.30 |
100.00 |
32.8 |
15.3 |
73 |
9.7 |
- |
|
20 |
86.09 |
50.80 |
63.28 |
93.10 |
32.8 |
16.7 |
74 |
10.2 |
- |
April
|
21 |
80.30 |
50.25 |
58.48 |
85.08 |
32.4 |
16.7 |
77 |
10.4 |
- |
|
22 |
74.00 |
49.95 |
42.38 |
77.02 |
32.9 |
19.9 |
81 |
10.3 |
- |
Thus,
it is clear that the latex yield in Hevea is sensitive to seasonal variation. This
variation is obviously on account of fluctuations in climatic factors according to change
in season. The relationship of latex yield to various climatic factors can be ascertained
with correlation analysis from Table-3. It is revealed
that in GT-1 the latex yield is positively correlated with minimum temperature and
relative humidity. This clearly indicates that warm climate is very favourable for latex
yield in GT-1. The dry cool climate reduces the yield drastically. In non graft clones
also the latex yield were positively correlated with maximum temperature and negatively
correlated with minimum temperature this again suggested the low temperature are
unfavorable for latex yield. Importantly relative humidity did not show correlation with
yield in non graft trees. In PR-107 and PRIM-600 the latex yield had no association with
temperature and relative humidity. The negative association with temperature and relative
humidity. The negative associations of latex yield with sunshine hours in PR-107 warrants
the importance of bright sunshine in determining the latex yield of Hevea.
Table 3
Correlation
coefficients of latex yield (ml/tree) of different genotypes of Hevea with climatic
parameters
Genotype |
Max.
temp |
Minimum
temp. |
Relative
Humidity |
Sunshine
hours |
Rainfall |
GT-1 |
0.524* |
-0.778* |
-0.549** |
-0.143 |
-0.599 |
PR-107 |
0.049* |
-0.309 |
-0.059 |
-.0.444* |
-0.174 |
PRIM-600 |
0.024 |
-0.233 |
-0.032 |
-0.179 |
-0.164 |
Non
graft tree |
0.445* |
-0.788* |
-0.379 |
-0.298 |
-0.459 |
*
Significant at 5%
** Significant at 1%
The multiple
regression equation fitted for explaining the dependence of latex yield on different
climatic factors on four genotypes of Hevea are given in Table-4.
It is revealed that in GT-1 67% variation in latex yield was extended by the climatic
factors prevailing during the year. In non graft clones more than 73% variation in latex
yield was explained by climatic factors during year under consideration. In PR-107 and
PRIM-600 the magnitudes of the coefficients of determination (R2) were very
poor (0.29 and 0.13 respectively). This clearly indicated the unsuitability of these two
genotypes in climatic condition of Konkan region. From foreign discussion it is clear that
the latex yield increase gradually with advancement of age of trees. The genotypes vary in
respect of latex yield potentials and sensitive to climatic factors. The non graft clone
have most promising performance followed by GT-1. For climatic conditions of Konkan region
the non graft clone and GT-1 should consider as most suitable types.
Table 4
Multiple
regression equations for latex yield in different genotypes of Hevea
Genotype |
Equation |
GT-1 |
Y=229.8-2.65x1-4.677x2+0.3036x3+0.0328x4
-0.045x5(R2=0.67) |
PR-107 |
Y=149.07-1.45 x1-0.47 x2-0.19 x3-0.73 x4-0.03
x5 (R2=0.29) |
PRIM-600 |
Y=179.05-3.47 x1-2.37 x2+0.64 x3+0.03 x4-0.x0.03
x5 (R2=0.13) |
Non graft
tree |
Y=51.65+0.49 x1-8.27 x2-2.25 x3+0.12 x4-0.03
x5 (R2=0.73) |
x1
= Max.Temp.
x2 = Min.Temp.
x3= Humidity
x4= Sunshine
x5= Rainfall
REFERENCES
Gomez K.A. and Gomez
A.A. (1983) Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. Second Edition. Published by
John wiley and sons Publication.
Jacob J.L., Prevot
J.C., Escnhach J.M., Lacrotte. R., Serres. E and A.Vidal (1991) Latex flow, cellular
regeneration and yield of Hevea brasiliensis. Influence of hormonal stimulation. In
proceedings of International congress of plant physiology (Eds. S.K.Sinha, P.V.Sane,
S.C.Bharagava and P.K.Agrawal) volume-I, Page-420-435. Published by society for plant
physiology and Biochemistry. WTC, Indian Agril. Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012.
Sethuraj M.R. (1991)-
Physiological investigations on factors influencing productivity in Hevea brasiliensis.
In proceedings of International Congress of Plant Physiology (Eds.S.K.Sinha, P.V.Sane,
S.C.Bhargava and P.K.Agrawal). Volume-I, Page-398-403. Published by Society for Plant
Physiology and Biochemistry. WTC, Indian Agril. Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012.