| Organic Cotton Farming In India
 
 
      
        | Article by: -  |  
        | A. T.P.RAJENDRAN Senior
        Scientist, Central Institute for
 Cotton Research,
 Nagpur
 | B.M.V.VENUGOPALAN Senior Scientist
        [Agronomy],National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land use Planning,
 Nagpur.
 | C. P.P.TARHALKAR Retired Principal
        Scientist [Agronomy],Central Institute for Cotton Research,
 Nagpur.
 | Cotton,
    the most important fibre crop of India plays a dominant role in its agrarian and
    industrial economy. It is the backbone of our textile industry, accounting for 70% of
    total fibre consumption in textile sector, and 38% of the country's export, fetching over
    Rs. 42,000 crores. Area under cotton cultivation in India (8.9 million ha) is the highest
    in the world, i.e., 25% of the world area and employs seven million people for their
    living. Cotton productivity
    in India is quite low as compared to world standards. The modern cotton production
    technology relies heavily on the use of fertilisers and on chemicals to control insect
    pests, diseases, weeds and growth regulators. Cotton cultivated on 5% cultivable land
    consumes 54% of total pesticides used in Indian agriculture, and in some pockets, the
    rates are higher than this, leaving immense ecological and human hazards as reported by
    World Health Organisation. Use of chemicals at such scale causes a lot of hazards to man,
    i.e., environmental pollution, soil health, and agro-ecology and poor profitability in
    cotton farming. This has basically prompted the demand of organically cultivated,
    eco-friendly or green cotton.  Scope for
    Organic Cotton Cultivation The preamble of
    organic farming has been aimed at conservation and optimised utilisation of all natural
    resources for a reasonable profitability under the guiding factors of sustainability of
    the farm. In order to keep a certain threshold of profit from the farms, all the farming
    practices have to be redesigned to undo the ill-effects that have crept in the current
    agricultural scenario while attempting to increase cotton production in the prevalent
    cropping systems. A sense of balancing act to moderate the resource utilisation with
    anticipation for suspected damage to mother earth is the essence of organic farming. The
    organic protocols of farming could accentuate and aid in imparting improved momentum to
    the bio-dynamism of crop fields. Lesser stable and poor bio-dynamism that has caused
    less-productive farms has alerted farmers on the question of long-term sustainance. At the end of this
    decade, it is quite satisfying to find that the above thoughts paved the way for increased
    adoption of non-chemical farming options. The happy marriage of conventional wisdom and
    rationalised modern agricultural technology has instilled sense optimism and hope to
    growers, especially in rain grown crops. The balancing act seems to be quite deft, but
    could have considerable impact on developing a better cause of modern Indian agriculture. Five to seven
    decades ago, most of the cotton cultivated in the country was eco-friendly
    with little or no use of toxic chemicals in its production. Even today, there are many
    pockets in India, where it is produced without the use of agrochemicals, e.g., areas
    growing Wagad cotton in Gujarat, Y-1 desi cotton of Khandesh region of Maharashtra,
    Maljari in Madhya Pradesh, part of areas growing Jayadhar and Suyodhar in Karnataka,
    Nandicum in Andhra Pradesh and parts of cotton areas in north eastern hill region. In the rainfed
    tract of central India, cotton is grown on three million hectare (i.e., 43% of total area)
    of marginal lands where production is low due to poorly distributed rainfall, and eroded
    undulating nature of lands and low resources investment by farmers. Such soils require
    low-cost and low external input production systems to minimise cost on fertiliser and
    pesticides for imparting stability in production. Cultivation of cotton with organic
    methods has helped farmers to improve sustainable productivity. The message on
    non-chemical and sustainable agriculture has pervaded to many parts of India and is
    hopefully making inroads into some of the southern cotton growing Indian states. Merits Of
    Organic Cotton Cultivation (A)
    Environmentally Friendly Technology i] Due to excessive
    use of fertilisers and insecticides, all the elements of the agro-eco system gets polluted
    by the conventional method. Organic cotton production relies on non-chemical inputs and
    will decrease pollution hazards. ii] Pesticides
    residues in fibre may cause carcinogenic damage to users. The use of bio-rational products
    and biocontrol agents for pest management in organic farming will cause no such effects. iii] Large scale
    discharge of untreated and unprocessed effluents by textile industry and dyeing units has
    not only caused health problems to man, cattle and fish in the rivers and canals, but
    yields of cotton are reported to be affected due to polluted water that is used for
    irrigation. iv] Destruction of
    beneficial soil organisms may cause damage to soil health creating imbalance in the
    natural population of predators/parasitoids of cotton pests. Organic farming helps to
    restore or preserve the natural equilibrium between different components of the ecosystem.
     (B)
    Reduction in Cost of Cultivation Modern production
    technology has lowered the cost-benefit ratio of cotton production. Farmers in Andhra
    Pradesh, Punjab, Maharashtra etc. are reported to have committed suicide due to escalation
    of production cost without occurring commensurate profit from cotton cultivation. On the
    other hand, organic farming creates rural employments and uses of on-farm resources to
    make it more cost-effective. (C)
    Management of Insecticide Resistance Due to
    indiscriminate use of hazardous insecticides for controlling cotton pests, the resistance
    of insects against the insecticide hiked up and in turn compelled the use of more number
    of sprays, and thus a vicious cycle is created, escalating cost of cultivation. Organic
    farming will help in reversing this trend. Evidences on poorer choice of multiplication
    rate of pests on organically grown cotton are encouraging factors to pursue this protocol.
     Approaches
    for Farming of Organic Cotton Since organic
    cotton production warrants the cultivation in the absence of agro-chemicals, it involves a
    careful selection of components of farming system keeping the local resources,
    agro-climatic features and socio-economic structure for the formation of a suitable
    package as follows: 1] Selection
    of site Fields with
    high degree of soil erosion and heavily infested with perennial weeds should not be put
    under organic farming. Organic farming is not a farming by neglect or arm-chair
    cultivation and so, fertility levels of less fertile soils should be improved through
    organic means before opting for this type of cultivation. 2] Varietal
    selection High yielding
    varieties, which respond well to chemical inputs, may not always be suitable for organic
    farming. Instead, varieties which are hardy and capable of giving acceptable farming
    especially in the early phase of conversion are ideal. Varieties, which are
    jassid-tolerant, can be preferred over susceptible ones. Early maturing varieties are less
    exhaustive and will also help the crop to escape heavy bollworm damage. 3] Seed
    rate and sowing Acid delinted
    seeds cannot be used according to international norms [e.g.IFOAM] for organic cultivation
    for the purpose of certification of the fibre. However, those farmers who pursue organic
    farming for reducing the cost of cultivation and to increase the profitability could use
    acid-delinted seeds in order to avoid seed borne pathogenic infections and achieve optimum
    plant stand. If fuzzy seeds are used, however, higher seed rate is to be used in order to
    achieve the same goal. About 25 kg/ha of seeds at 75x15 cm spacing ensures a final plant
    population of 85-90 thousand plants/ha. One row of fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)
    should be drilled between two rows of cotton. This crop could be ploughed down and buried
    in soil just before its flowering.  4] Manuring To realise
    economical production, soil fertility has to be maintained and gradually improved.
    Improvement and maintenance of organic matter of the soil is important in organic cotton
    production, as this would increase physical parameters of soil, improve soil structure and
    enhance nutrient supply. Since huge amounts of FYM to meet nutrient requirement of the
    cotton crop is not generally available, a combination of sources with different biological
    properties should be preferably used. Organic manures (FYM, compost, Vermicompost), in
    situ green manuring, cowpea and biofertilisers along with fertility restoring crop
    rotations form the components for maintaining soil fertility.  a] Farm
    yard manuring [FYM]  FYM @ 15 t/ha must
    be added before preparatory tillage and mixed thoroughly. FYM should be well decomposed
    and should be preferably treated with composting organisms such as Trichoderma viride.
    The rate may gradually be brought down 5-10 t/ha, once the farm yield stabilises over a
    few years. b] Fodder
    cowpea  In situ green
    manuring with fodder cowpea and its burying at 40 days after sowing [DAS] will ensure a
    steady N supply during the grand-growth phase and flowering period, when the N demand
    peaks up in the crop. It hastens microbial activity in soil, reduces weed growth and
    enhances natural enemy build up. This provides
    around 400-500 kg dry matter per hectare with 2.5% N and contributes 10-12 kg N/ha during
    squaring. Its additional benefits include smothering of weeds, controlling seasonal soil
    erosion and nurturing natural enemies of cotton pests. c] Dhaincha
    (Sesbania aculeata) Dense stand of this
    legume can be raised around cotton field at a width of 2 m; its lopping cut and spread
    between cotton rows at 65-70 DAS. Its fast decomposing leaves provide N during early boll
    development period and stalks act as temporary mulch, preventing soil moisture
    evaporation.  d]
    Vermicompost Vermicompost @ 1-2
    t/ha should be added supplementing FYM on the furrow lines on which sowing is done. Its
    nutrient composition varies with substrate that is verrmicomposted, but generally contains
    several diverse microflora that aid in good plant growth. It offers good scope for
    recycling of farm waste. e]
    Biofertilisers  Seed inoculation of
    Azatobactor or Azospirillum @ 200 g/seed required for sowing one acre is
    recommended. 5)
    Technology for Composting (i)
    VERMICOMPOST Reliance on green
    biomass and farmyard manure is a sure method of increasing soil organic content. However,
    under the existing conditions, these requirements are not fully met with. Enormous
    quantity of farm wastes and organic residues are simply burnt. In order to utilise farm
    wastes and organic residue for being recycled into compost, the modern thoughts are for
    utilising earthworms and fungus that are habituated to such conversion. Promising Indian
    species, Eisenia foetida can convert organic wastes into vermicompost in about one
    month's time and convert anything except plastic into compost.  Since preparation
    of vermicompost utilising any of the above species can be a very promising endeavour in
    rural areas, in addition to meeting the compost requirement of one's own farm, it is
    desirable to take this up as part of organic farming. The brief details regarding
    vermicomposting techniques is as follows.  Vermicompost can be
    made in raised beds of 15-25 cm height. The length and width can vary according to the
    quantum of wastes available for composing. Beds of 6x2 m are ideal. These beds should be
    made slightly raised at the centre and sloping towards the sides (to facilitate effective
    drainage), preferably under shade. As earthworms do not relish light, it is advisable to
    keep the pits covered. Darkness also reduces the composting time.  A soft bedding
    material with wheat/soybean straw is added as the first layer. This should be followed by
    a thin layer of cow dung slurry. Earthworm culture @ 1 kg/10m length of bed (2m wide) is
    then added. Earthworm cocoons or starter inoculant worms from vermi compost can also be
    used. Weeds, leaves chopping, farm wastes, household wastes and other degradable materials
    can be continuously added on the top. Water should be sprinkled periodically to keep the
    beds slightly moist, but never wet. Under ideal moist and temperature conditions (27-33°
    C) the composting time would be 40-50 days. Earthworm castings contain approximately
    2.0-2.5% N, 2.5-2.9 per cent P2O5 and 1.2- 1.4% K2O, the
    exact composition varies according to the substrate and composting conditions. The excreta
    of organisms contain more N content over their level of consumption of N as in vermi
    castings too. (ii)
    COMPOSTING OF COTTON STALKS THROUGH Trichoderma viride Cotton stalks are
    burnt as fuel after picking of seed cotton is over. This residue together with farm wastes
    from other crops and weeds can effectively be utilised for preparing compost, through the
    use of beneficial fungi like Trichoderma viride. The technique, as developed at
    CICR, Nagpur is briefly described.  In a pit of 10 x 2
    x 1m in size, dried cotton stalks from 2 hectare area are filled in four layers
    interspersed with other soft farm waste, such as sorghum stubble, linseed straw and
    soybean pod-haulms (to fill the gaps in between cotton stalks) and 50 kg of cow dung (to
    provide a soft substrate for initial multiplication of the fungus). Each layer was
    sprinkle inoculated with 2.5 kg T.viride wettable powder in 60 litre water mixed
    with half-kilogram jaggery and 15 g yeast. The pit is finally covered with one foot layer
    of sunhemp stalks for checking water loss. Periodic watering is made to maintain
    sufficient moisture in the pit and turning of the top layer at least once during the
    decomposition process. In the span of four
    months, most of the cotton stalks are converted into compost, the rest (20%) being black,
    brittle, semi-decomposed stalks. This compost is comparable to well-decomposed
    vermicompost. It could be used for nutrient recycling, antagonistic fungus against certain
    soil-borne pathogens, viz., Fusarium spp., Rhizoctonia spp. etc. 6)
    Weed Management Fields not infested
    with perennial weeds such as Cyperus sp. (Motha), Cyanodon dactylon (Doob)
    and Sachharum sp. (Kans) are preferred for organic farming as these are difficult
    to control. However, if such weeds occur in patches, their underground propagatory
    structures (stolons, rhizomes etc.) must be exposed by summer cultivation and manually
    removed. Mechanical/manual weeding as per existing practice may be adopted. Composting can
    recycle the weeds removed. It must be ensured that the FYM, compost added is completely
    decomposed, otherwise many seeds of annual weeds, introduced through FYM, will germinate
    and aggravate the weed problem. Growing a crop of cowpea between 2 rows of cotton will
    also suppress the early emerging weeds. 7)
    Selection of Rotations Crop rotations play
    a very important role in restoring soil fertility and minimising damage due to insect
    pests and weeds. High nutrient-exhaustive rotations must be avoided and instead rotations
    with a legume that is recommended for the locality may be adopted. 8)
    IPM Strategies for Crop Protection The crop protection
    to reduce the damage due to insect pests to organically cultivated cotton revolves around
    the use of bioagents such as predators such as Chrysoperla sp. or Apertochrysa spp.,
    egg parasitoids such as Trichogramma, larval parasitoids such as Habrobracon spp.
    or insect pathogens such as Helicoverpa armigera Nuclear Polyhydrosis Virus [NPV]
    and a bacterium, Bacillus thuringuiensis var. kurstaki (B.t.k.) formulations
    along with utilisation of bird perches and botanical insecticides like neem products. Avoidance of
    pesticide application by introducing biocontrol agents, either by natural augmentation
    processes or by artificial releases increased the stability of cotton cultivation. The
    basic concept of conserving natural mortality agents of pests can be achieved in organic
    cotton cultivation, primarily by reducing insecticide application. These toxicants destroy
    both, pests and their natural enemies, and so, are not desirable for common use. To sum
    up, the following pest suppression strategies are recommended for organic cotton
    cultivation. 
      Select a reasonably jassid tolerant
        cultivator.Release of Chrysoperla spp. @
        500-1000/ha according to the intensity of jassid damage between 20-25 days of crop growth
        once. For jassid susceptible cultivator, this may be released after 35 days.Release Trichocards @ 5/ha once at
        45-50 days and then after 10-12 days, twice more in order to kill bollworm eggs.Spray H-NPV @ 250 larval equivalent
        (LE) [1LE= 200 crore (109 ) Poly Inclusion Bodies [PIBs] or Poly Occlusion
        Bodies [POBs] when very young larvae of American bollworm are spotted. This could be
        repeated after every 15 days for retaining good inoculum of the pathogen. This could be
        alternated with any commercial B.t. formulation @ 1.5 l/ha.Release of Habrobracon hebator
        is also useful for controlling growing bollworm larvae and other caterpillars damaging
        leaves and flowers.Placement of bird perches @ 5-6/ha
        would help in increasing the predatory bird visit in cotton fields.The need-based botanical
        insecticides, seed kernel extract is used at 5% v/v or 1-% oil are very useful to deter
        pest activity in the crop.Monitoring of bollworm using the
        respective pheromone traps would give a clue regarding their first occurrence in a season
        in order to initiate adequate and suitable crop protection measures.One of the important cultural
        practices that is desirable is to depot the crop that has grown beyond 80 days. This would
        reduce the egg laying of H.armigera. From the studies
    conducted at Central institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur on the technology generation
    for sustainable organic cotton production and its evaluation with conventional farming
    with use of chemicals (fertilisers and insecticides), the following facts have emerged for
    careful consideration. (a) In a span of
    3-4 years, there was gradual build up in soil productivity and seed cotton yield in
    organic farming was at par to non-organic farming (Fig 1). (b) In the initial
    year, the yield realisation through organic system was about 40% of that of conventional
    (non-organic) system, with comparable or slightly higher (7-10%) production costs. This
    situation improves in subsequent years (c) There was also
    a gradual improvement in soil fertility parameters such as organic carbon content and
    available P (Fig 2a & b). The organic carbon content stabilised at 0.50-0.55% after
    4-5 years. (d) One interesting
    observation was that even jassid susceptible cultivator such as LRA. 5166 showed good
    tolerance to jassid infestation under organic environment. There was a good
    build up of natural enemies, such as egg, larval and pupal parasitoids, and also of
    various predators of cotton pests (Fig 3). Under continuous cultivation of cotton in
    organic environment, its stability situation for better performance was achieved over a
    period of time. Capability of cotton plant to withstand pest infestation was found to be
    highly remarkable (Fig 4). According to the
    estimates of Cotton Corporation of India, Mumbai 14-15 lakh bales of organic cotton is
    produced in India and used for making textile products. A few thousand bales of organic
    cotton are exported without any eco-label. Concentrated efforts are lacking on research,
    extension, and marketing and trade fronts. The estimated certified organic cotton fibre
    production for 1997 in India as well as that of other nations of the world is given in
    Table 1. As given therein, Indian certified organic cotton production is 15% of the total
    world production of this type of lint and it is about 37% of the Asian production. In
    addition to this, there is several uncertified quantity of the fibre that is not included
    in this statistics. Unlike other countries where organic cotton production is sponsored
    programme and is more organised in its marketing, the Indian organic cotton production
    seems to be much more than what is actually recorded. Being a leading global producer of
    medium and long staple length lint through organic methods, we have the advantage of
    competing in the supply and demand position of the world. This could add to the
    profitability to our cotton growers. Awareness for
    growing organic cotton, however, is growing. Many voluntary organisations, like VOFA
    (VIDARBHA ORGANIC FARMERS ASSOCIATION), MOFA (MAHARASHTRA ORGANIC FARMERS ASSOCIATION),
    SHRIDA-BIORE etc. have been formed either by farmers groups interested in organic cotton
    cultivation or to assist such groups by offering technical assistance. Around 1200
    hectares of land was cultivated under organically grown cotton by 135 farmers in Vidarbha
    region of Maharashtra alone through voluntary association-VOFA with average yield level of
    500-750 kg/ha. The technological properties of various cultivators grown under the organic
    cultivation such as micronaire (3.8-5.0), span length (25.5-29.9 mm) and fibre maturity
    parameters were similar to fibres produced by conventional methods. A voluntary
    Organisation - INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR ORGANIC AGRICULTURE MOVEMENT [IFOAM] has
    formulated standards and guidelines for organic cotton cultivation and are followed by
    many labelling agencies to certify organic cotton and other farm produce.  Technology for
    growing organic cotton for different regions of the country is being developed for its
    higher profitable and sustainable production so that marketing agencies can market organic
    cotton to potential buyers. Efforts are needed to identify and tap such buyers of organic
    cotton and yarn. It is necessary to contact and tap some leading international buyers from
    Japan, Korea, Thailand etc. to explore the marketing of organic cotton. Premium prospects
    of organic cotton trade will have to be fully explored. Selected Further
    reading 
      Dorothy Myers and Sue Stolton (ed.).
        1999. Organic Cotton  from field to final product. Intermediate Technology
        Publication, 250 pp. Kairon, M.S., Tarhalkar, P.P.,
        Rajendran, T.P., Venugopalan, M.V. And Bambawale, O.M. (1998). Organic cotton cultivation
         Technology and issues to be addressed. Journal of Indian Society for Cotton
        Improvement Special issue on the Natural and Colour Cotton Workshop held in May 1997.Technology generated for
        organic-cotton cultivation. ICAR NEWS 4(2): 1-2. M.S.Kairon, P.P.Tarhalkar,
        T.P.Rajendran, O.M.Bambawale And M.V.Venugopalan, 1998. Third IFOAM-ASIA Scientific
        Conference "Food Security in Harmony with Nature", 1-4 Dec., 1997, UAS,
        Hebbal, Bangalore. Soil fertility management in organic cotton cultivation. pp.
        7-8.P.P.Tarhalkar, M.V.Venugopalan,
        T.P.Rajendran, O.M.Bambawale and M.S.Kairon (1996). Generation and evaluation of
        appropriate technology for organic cotton cultivation in rainfed vertisols. Journal of
        Indian Society for Cotton Improvement Improvement.21:111-122  Table: 1 CERTIFIED
    ORGANIC COTTON FIBRE PRODUCTION IN 1997 
      
        | Continent/country
 | Output | Source | % of global(tonnes)
 | Total  |  
        | AFRICA |  |  |  |  |  
        | Egypt | 500 | ECOA |  |  |  
        | Uganda | 800 | AGRO
        ECO |  |  |  
        | Tanzania | 200 | BIOHERB |  |  |  
        | Mozambique | 50 | IAM |  |  |  
        | Zimbabwe | 5 | ZIP
        RESEARCH |  |  |  
        | Benin | 5 | OBEPAB |  |  |  
        | Senegal | 10 | ENDA-PRONAT |  |  |  
        | CONTINENT TOTAL | 1570 |  |  | 19 |  
        | ASIA |  |  |  |  |  
        | India |  |  |  |  |  
        | MAIKAAL | 900 |  |  |  |  
        | SRIDA | 30 |  |  |  |  
        | VOFA | 105 |  |  |  |  
        | GINNI
        PROJECT  | 240 |  |  |  |  
        | TOTAL | 1175 |  |  | 15 |  
        | Turkey |  |  |  |  |  
        | Bo
        weevil | 500 | Bo
        weevil |  |  |  
        | Rapunzel | 100 |  |  |  |  
        | Others | 1200 | Bo
        weevil |  |  |  
        | TOTAL | 1800 |  |  | 22 |  
        | Israel | 50 | IBOAA | Minimal
        1 |  |  
        | Greece | 110 | CLASSICO |  |  |  
        | CONTINENT
        TOTAL | 3135 |  |  | 38 |  
        | LATIN
        AMERICA  |  |  |  |  |  
        | PERU | 700 | PER
        JIBORN |  |  |  
        | ARGENTINA | 70 | PYMA
        COTTON |  |  |  
        | BRAZIL | 5 | RICHARD
        HARITY |  |  |  
        | NICARAGUA
         | 20 | ECOFIBER
        INDEX |  |  |  
        | PARAGUAY | 50 | ECOFIBER
        INDEX |  |  |  
        | CONTINENT
        TOTAL | 845 |  |  | 11 |  
        | UNITED
        STATES FOR AMERICA
 | 2600 | ORGANIC
        FIBER COUNCIL |  | 32 |  
        | GRAND
        TOTAL | 8150 |  |  |  | (Source:
    Dorothy Myers and Sue Stolton (ed.). 1999. Organic Cotton-from field to final product.) |